Well, the opposite of the prefix 'mega', is 'mini', and author Tom Wolfe, in his essay titled "Afterward: High in the Saddle", which describes the aftermath of the literary scandal caused by his articles in the New York Herald Tribune in 1965, titled "Tiny Mummies" and "Lost in the Whichy Thicket" about The New Yorker magazine and its editor William Shawn, contains the following paragraph on pages 262-3 of the book Hooking Up, which collects these and other Wolfe articles.
Earlier in the same book, in a Foreword to this entire story (page 252), Wolfe cites his source:By now The New Yorker had decided to take a page from a master, namely, Aristotle, who had advised that if the argument was giving you problems, -- in this case, the argument that the New Yorker was a dull magazine edited by a minimomaniac (emphasis mine - A.) -- then go after the facts and try to invalidate the argument that way
.
Malcolm Muggeridge once wrote that the world was full of megalomaniacs but that William Shawn was the only minimomaniac he had ever metAnd so, it is 'minomomania', and 'minomomaniac', two words not found in my dictionaries and found only in one place on the World Wide Web by Google (at least until this is published and indexed.)Tom Wolfe describes William Shawn as follows:
Shawn is a very quiet man. He has a soft, somewhat high voice.He seems to whisper all the time. [...] The Shawn whisper, the whisper zone radiates our from Shawn himself. Shawn in the hallways slips along as soundlessly as humanly possible and--chooooo--he meets somebody right there in the hall. The nodding! The whispering. Shawn is fifty seven years old but still has a boyish face. He is a small plump man, round in the cheeks.
(To read the rest of the story, get the book.)[...] He is self-effacing, kind, quiet, dilligent, an efficient man, courtly, refined, considerate, humble, and -- Shawn uses this quiet business like a maestro. He has the quiet moxie to walk through the snow at 3 a.m. to the apartment of somebody who owes him a story--the magazine is at absolute deadline, and this writer is revising and revising and won't turn loose of the story...
I've known some minomomaniacs, and I can tell you that the affliction buys one much less friendship and affection than being an antonymic opposite of that. A co-worker of mine some years ago was probably a minimomaniac. His physique and manners were similar to those of William Shawn, except that he wasn't as accomplished or well positioned as Shawn, and he wasn't married. In fact, he didn't have much luck with women at all.
I remember in the place where we worked, he walked the long hallways of the building so close to the wall he rubbed it with his shoulder, as if he wanted to merge into it, hug it, become invisible. Shy, self-effacing, a conscientious worker, and a terrific friend to those (men) who knew him, he was lonely and depressed, though he never showed it.
What's most interesting however, is that when he tried to come out, so to speak, and assert himself just a little, whether in a mixed group or with individual females, he was always being pushed back, put down and stomped upon, for being too aggressive, impertinent and rude. And he wasn't by any measure. The man was simply expected to forever remain a wallflower, as the saying goes, to be invisible, to remain that minimomaniac. He wouldn't be accepted as anything else but that. Who knows what happened to him after I moved away.